AI-Native Testing Audit
Your test suite wasn't designed for AI agents. Let's find out how far off it is.
Most Playwright frameworks I audit fail the same way: they work fine when a human runs them, and fall apart the moment an AI agent — Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code — tries to extend them. Ambiguous locators, implicit waits, undocumented fixtures, flaky CI. The agent amplifies every weakness a human quietly worked around.
The ArchQA AI-Native Testing Audit is a fixed-price, fixed-scope review that tells you exactly where your framework stands — and exactly what to fix first.
$499 fixed · delivered in 5 business days · one slot per week
What your report looks like
Not a slide deck of generic advice. Every area scored, every finding tied to code:
What you receive
- The scored audit report — every area rated with concrete findings, code references, and severity
- A prioritized 90-day roadmap — sequenced fixes, ordered by impact-to-effort, that your team can execute without me
- A 60-minute walkthrough call — I present the findings to you (and your team, if you want them in the room) and answer everything
Who this is for
- QA leads and engineering managers running Playwright (or migrating to it) with a team of 2+ engineers
- Teams introducing AI coding assistants who want tests that help agents instead of confusing them
- Teams whose suite "mostly works" but eats hours in flaky reruns and review friction
Not for you if you have fewer than ~50 tests, or you're looking for someone to write tests for you. (For the second case — that's the implementation engagement, and the audit is the first step.)
Price
$499, fixed. No hourly billing, no scope creep.
If you decide to move forward with an implementation engagement afterward, the full $499 is credited toward it. The audit is never a sunk cost.
Or email me directly: ivan.archqa@gmail.com
Why me
I'm Ivan Davidov — QA Automation Lead, founder of ArchQA, and creator of the Playwright Scaffold — a framework built from the ground up to be AI-agent-compatible (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot). It's the same architecture this audit measures your suite against.
- Trained 3,500+ engineers in test automation at SoftUni
- Co-instructor of Orchestrating AI-Native Testing with Playwright (Packt), alongside Debbie O'Brien
- ISTQB CTFL & PSM I certified
- I publish my thinking in public — the blog, the ArchQA Unscripted YouTube channel, and GitHub — so you can check the quality of the work before you pay for it
FAQ
Do you need access to our production systems? No. Read-only access to the test repository and CI logs is enough. I'll sign an NDA if your process requires one.
Our framework isn't Playwright. Is the audit still useful? The audit is Playwright-specific by design — that's what makes it fast and precise. If you're on Cypress or Selenium and planning a migration, the audit doubles as a migration assessment; mention it when you book.
What does "AI-readiness" actually mean? Whether a coding agent, given your repo as context, can add a correct, convention-following test without human babysitting. Most suites can't support that today. The report shows you the specific gaps.
Can we ask questions after the walkthrough call? You get one week of async follow-up questions after the call, included.
What happens after the audit? You own the report and roadmap outright — many teams execute it themselves. If you want help, we scope an implementation project, and your $499 is credited.
One audit slot per week. Booking now schedules the next available slot. Or email me directly: ivan.archqa@gmail.com